SOURCES & BACKGROUND
​
This page documents why we've ordered the New Testament books the way we have—and where you can dig deeper if you want to check our work.
The Short Version

Most Bibles arrange the New Testament by genre: Gospels first, then Acts, then Paul's letters, then the general epistles, then Revelation. That's a logical way to organize a library.

But it's not the order these books were written.
​
When you read the New Testament chronologically—in the order the letters actually arrived—you experience Scripture the way the first Christians did. One letter at a time. Over twenty years. As history unfolded around them.

Why This Dating?

​The reading order in this plan follows the traditional dating of the New Testament-the view the church held for roughly 1,800 years before it was displaced in the 1800s.

This traditional view places all 27 books between AD 48 and AD 68-within one generation before Jerusalem's fall in AD 70. Late dating (post-70 for many books, AD 90s for John and Revelation) emerged with German higher criticism in the 1800s and was reinforced by theological systems like dispensationalism that required later dates.
​
Scholars like Robinson and Bernier aren't proposing something new-they're recovering what was lost.
This matters because:
  • The urgency makes sense. When Paul says "the time is short" and Peter says "the end of all things is at hand," they weren't wrong. They were writing to people who would see Jerusalem fall within their lifetime.
  • The prophecies land differently. Jesus said "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." If the books were written before AD 70, His words were fulfilled exactly as spoken.
  • The context changes everything. Knowing when each book was written helps you understand why it was written—and what the original readers were facing.
KEY SOURCES:

Our chronological order draws primarily from two scholars who recovered the traditional view:
John A.T. Robinson — Redating the New Testament (1976)

Robinson was a respected Anglican bishop and scholar who set out to validate the late-dating consensus-and ended up convinced it was wrong. His central argument: the New Testament's silence about the temple's destruction (AD 70) proves the books were written before it happened. He was surprised to find that the "consensus" had little actual evidence behind it.

Jonathan Bernier — Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament (2022)
Bernier updated Robinson's work with contemporary scholarship and Bayesian probability analysis. His conclusion: the traditional pre-70 dating is not only credible but arguably stronger than the late-dating view that displaced it.

Additional sources:
  • F.F. Bruce, New Testament History (1969)
  • Josephus, The Jewish War and Antiquities of the Jews
  • Tacitus, Annals
  • Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History
THE READING ORDER AT A GLANCE
Book
Date
Key Evidence
James
AD 48
No Jerusalem Council, primitive theology
Mark
AD 48
Olivet Discourse as future prophecy
Matthew
AD 50
Jewish focus, no temple destruction
Galatians
AD 49
Written shortly after Jerusalem meeting
1 Thessalonians
AD 51
Gallio Inscription anchor
2 Thessalonians
AD 51
Follows 1 Thessalonians
1 Corinthians
AD 55
Ephesian ministry period
2 Corinthians
AD 56
Macedonian journey
Romans
AD 57
Collection journey, Corinthian origin
Ephesians
AD 60
Prison letter, Tychicus carrier
Colossians
AD 60
Prison, same messengers as Philemon
Philemon
AD 61
Prison, Onesimus
Philippians
AD 61
Praetorian Guard references
Luke
AD 61
Before Acts, "we" passages
Acts
AD 62
Silence about Paul's death, temple
Hebrews
AD 63
Temple cultus in present tense
1 Peter
AD 63
"Babylon" = Rome, before intense persecution
Jude
AD 64
Before 2 Peter
1 Timothy
AD 64
Post-release journey
2 Peter
AD 64
Imminent death, Great Fire context
Titus
AD 65
Crete ministry
John
AD 65
Present tense temple references
1 John
AD 66
Post-Gospel, community crisis
2 John
AD 66
Same themes as 1 John
3 John
AD 66
Contemporary letter
2 Timothy
AD 67
Final imprisonment, farewell tone
Revelation
AD 68
Temple standing, Nero, urgency
BOOK-BY-BOOK BACKGROUND

​Scroll to any book below to see why we've dated it where we have.
1. James (AD 48)

Author: James, the Lord's brother, leader of the Jerusalem church
Why this date:
  • No mention of the Jerusalem Council (AD 49) or its decisions about Gentile believers
  • Primitive theology with no developed Pauline concepts
  • Jewish character throughout (synagogue reference, Abraham as "our father")
Key sources:
  • Josephus, Antiquities 20.9.1 - Records James's death in AD 62
  • Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 2.23 - Preserves early tradition of James as Jerusalem leader
​
2. Mark (AD 48)

Author: John Mark, companion of Peter and Paul
Why this date:
  • Olivet Discourse (Mark 13) recorded as future prophecy, not fulfilled history
  • Aramaic phrases preserved and translated - suggests proximity to eyewitnesses
  • Roman context fits Peter's presence in Rome
Key sources:
  • Papias (c. AD 130) - "Mark, having become Peter's interpreter, wrote down accurately everything he remembered"
  • 1 Peter 5:13 - Peter calls Mark "my son" from Rome​
​
3. Matthew (AD 50)

Author: Matthew (Levi), tax collector and apostle
Why this date:
  • Strong Jewish character: genealogy from Abraham, "kingdom of heaven," extensive OT quotations
  • No indication the temple destruction prophecy (Matt 24) has been fulfilled
  • Early church tradition places Matthew first among the Gospels
Key sources:
  • Papias - "Matthew collected the oracles in the Hebrew language"
  • Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1.1 - "Matthew published a written Gospel among the Hebrews"

Jesus' Warnings and Their Fulfillment (Matthew 24)

​In Matthew 24, Jesus gave His disciples specific warnings about what would happen before "the end." He concluded: "This generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (Matthew 24:34).
Was He wrong? Or have we been misreading what "the end" meant?
When you trace these warnings through history, something remarkable emerges: every warning Jesus gave came to pass within forty years - before the generation He spoke to had passed away.
Warning (Matthew 24)
Historical Fulfillment
Primary Source
False messiahs (v. 5, 24)
Theudas (~AD 44-46), The Egyptian (~AD 52-58), numerous others during the Jewish War
Josephus, Antiquities 20.5.1, 20.8.6; Wars 2.13.4-5
Wars and rumors of wars (v. 6)
Roman-Parthian conflicts, Jewish revolts, civil wars of AD 68-69 (Year of Four Emperors)
Tacitus, Histories 1-3; Josephus, Wars 2-4
Famines (v. 7)
Severe famine under Claudius (~AD 46-48), affecting Judea and the empire
Acts 11:28; Josephus, Antiquities 20.2.5; Suetonius, Claudius 18
Earthquakes (v. 7)
Pompeii (AD 62), Laodicea/Colossae (AD 60), Crete, Smyrna, Miletus, Chios, Samos
Seneca, Natural Questions 6; Tacitus, Annals 14.27, 15.22
Persecution and martyrdom (v. 9-10)
Stephen stoned (~AD 33-34), James son of Zebedee executed (AD 44), James the Lord's brother killed (AD 62), Peter and Paul martyred (~AD 64-67), Nero's persecution (AD 64+)
Acts 7, 12:1-2; Josephus, Antiquities 20.9.1; Tacitus, Annals 15.44; Eusebius, Church History 2.25
Gospel preached to all nations (v. 14)
Paul: "their voice has gone out to all the earth" (Romans 10:18); Colossians: the gospel "has been proclaimed in all creation under heaven" (Col 1:23)
Romans 10:18; Colossians 1:6, 23
Abomination of desolation (v. 15)
Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem (AD 66-70); Zealots desecrating the temple; Roman standards in the holy place
Luke 21:20; Josephus, Wars 4.3.7-10, 6.6.1
Great tribulation (v. 21)
Siege of Jerusalem (AD 70): ~1.1 million dead, 97,000 enslaved, mass crucifixions, cannibalism from starvation
Josephus, Wars 5-6
Flight to the mountains (v. 16)
Christians fled to Pella before the siege - no Christians recorded dying in the destruction
Eusebius, Church History 3.5.3; Epiphanius, Panarion 29.7, 30.2
Celestial signs (v. 29)
Comet over Jerusalem for a year (AD 66), star resembling a sword, chariots in the sky before Passover
Josephus, Wars 6.5.3
"This generation" (v. 34)
A biblical generation is 40 years. Jesus spoke these words ~AD 30. The temple fell AD 70 - exactly 40 years.
Matthew 24:34; cf. Numbers 32:13, Hebrews 3:9-10
The warning worked. Jesus told His followers that when they saw "the abomination of desolation," they should flee immediately (Matthew 24:15-18). According to Eusebius and Epiphanius, the Jerusalem church received a prophetic warning and fled to Pella before the siege tightened. No Christians are recorded dying in the destruction of Jerusalem. The warning wasn't just prediction - it was instruction. And those who heeded it survived.
​
4. Galatians (AD 49)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Galatians 2:1-10 describes a Jerusalem meeting about Gentile circumcision - likely the Jerusalem Council
  • Written in the heat of the controversy, before the issue was fully settled
  • South Galatian theory places recipients in churches from Acts 13-14
Key sources:
  • Acts 15 - The Jerusalem Council (AD 49)
  • Suetonius - Claudius expelled Jews from Rome in AD 49 "at the instigation of Chrestus"​
​
5. 1 Thessalonians (AD 51)

Author: Paul, with Silvanus and Timothy
Why this date:
  • The Gallio Inscription (discovered at Delphi) dates Gallio as proconsul of Achaia to AD 51-52
  • Paul appeared before Gallio in Corinth (Acts 18:12)
  • This is the most secure anchor point in Pauline chronology
Key sources:
  • Gallio Inscription - Archaeological discovery at Delphi
  • Acts 17-18 - Paul's founding visit to Thessalonica and time in Corinth
​
6. 2 Thessalonians (AD 51)

Author: Paul, with Silvanus and Timothy
Why this date:
  • Same sender formula as 1 Thessalonians
  • Clarifies misunderstanding about "the day of the Lord" from the first letter
  • Written shortly after 1 Thessalonians while Paul was still in Corinth
Key sources:
  • Internal connection to 1 Thessalonians
  • 2 Thessalonians 3:17 - Paul's autograph confirms authenticity
​
7. 1 Corinthians (AD 55)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Written from Ephesus during Paul's third missionary journey (1 Cor 16:8)
  • Gallio dating anchors Corinth visit to AD 50-52; Ephesus ministry follows
  • Aquila and Prisca send greetings from Ephesus (1 Cor 16:19)
Key sources:
  • Acts 19 - Paul's extended ministry in Ephesus ("two years" plus additional time)
  • 1 Corinthians 16:8 - "I will stay in Ephesus until Pentecost"
​
8. 2 Corinthians (AD 56)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Written from Macedonia after leaving Ephesus (Acts 20:1-2)
  • References a "painful visit" and resolution of a crisis in Corinth
  • Titus brought good news from Corinth (2 Cor 7:5-7)
Key sources:
  • 2 Corinthians 11:23-28 - Paul's catalog of sufferings
  • Acts 20:1-2 - Paul's journey through Macedonia
​
9. Romans (AD 57)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Written from Corinth during Paul's third missionary journey
  • Paul is about to take a collection to Jerusalem (Rom 15:25-28)
  • Phoebe from Cenchreae (near Corinth) carried the letter (Rom 16:1)
Key sources:
  • Romans 16:23 - "Gaius, who is host to me and to the whole church" (Corinth)
  • Acts 20:2-3 - Paul spent three months in Greece before heading to Jerusalem
​
10. Ephesians (AD 60)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Paul identifies as a "prisoner" (Eph 3:1, 4:1, 6:20)
  • Tychicus will deliver the letter (Eph 6:21-22) - same messenger mentioned in Colossians
  • Written during Paul's Roman imprisonment (Acts 28:30-31)
Key sources:
  • Colossians 4:7-8 - Tychicus mentioned in nearly identical terms
  • Acts 28:30-31 - Paul's two-year Roman imprisonment
​
11. Colossians (AD 60)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Paul is in chains (Col 4:3, 4:18)
  • Same messengers as Philemon (Tychicus and Onesimus)
  • Same greetings list as Philemon - written and sent together
Key sources:
  • Colossians 1:7, 4:12-13 - Epaphras founded the Colossae church
  • Tacitus, Annals 14.27 - Major earthquake destroyed Laodicea in AD 60
​
12. Philemon (AD 60)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Paul is a "prisoner for Christ Jesus" (Philemon 1)
  • Onesimus converted while Paul was in prison (Philemon 10)
  • Same companions as Colossians - written simultaneously
Key sources:
  • Internal connection to Colossians
  • Philemon 23-24 - Same greeting list as Colossians 4
​
13. Philippians (AD 61)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Paul is in prison; gospel spreading through "the whole imperial guard" (Phil 1:13)
  • "Those of Caesar's household" send greetings (Phil 4:22) - points to Rome
  • Expectation of release (Phil 2:24) suggests later in the imprisonment
Key sources:
  • Acts 16:14-15, 40 - Lydia's house church in Philippi
  • Acts 16:25-34 - The Philippian jailer's conversion
​
14. Luke (AD 61)

Author: Luke, Paul's companion
Why this date:
  • Luke-Acts is a two-volume work; Acts ends with Paul in Rome (AD 60-62)
  • "We" passages in Acts indicate the author traveled with Paul
  • Written before Acts, which shows no knowledge of Paul's death or the temple's destruction
Key sources:
  • Colossians 4:14 - "Luke the beloved physician"
  • Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1.1 - "Luke, the companion of Paul, recorded in a book the Gospel preached by him"
​
15. Acts (AD 62)

Author: Luke
Why this date:
  • Acts ends abruptly with Paul awaiting trial in Rome - no outcome mentioned
  • No mention of Paul's death, Peter's death, or the temple's destruction
  • If Luke knew these events, his silence is inexplicable
Key sources:
  • Acts 28:30-31 - The abrupt ending
  • Robinson's central argument: the silence of Acts proves pre-70 composition
​
16. Hebrews (AD 63)

Author: Unknown (Paul, Barnabas, Apollos suggested)
Why this date:
  • The entire argument assumes the temple cultus is still operating (present tense throughout chapters 7-10)
  • If the temple had been destroyed, this would be the clinching argument - but it's never mentioned
  • "Timothy has been released" (Heb 13:23) - suggests post-imprisonment context
Key sources:
  • Hebrews 8:13 - "What is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away" (not "has vanished")
  • Clement of Rome (AD 96) quotes Hebrews extensively
​
17. I Peter (AD 63)

Author: Peter
Why this date:
  • Written from "Babylon" (1 Pet 5:13) - widely understood as Rome
  • Mark is with Peter (1 Pet 5:13)
  • "Fiery trial" (4:12) suggests early local persecution, before Nero's organized campaign
Key sources:
  • 1 Peter 5:12 - "By Silvanus, a faithful brother... I have written briefly"
  • Colossians 4:10, 2 Timothy 4:11 - Mark's presence in Rome
​
18. Jude (AD 64)

Author: Jude, brother of James (and therefore of Jesus)
Why this date:
  • References "the predictions of the apostles" as past instruction (Jude 17-18)
  • Jude 4-18 parallels 2 Peter 2:1-3:3 - Jude likely wrote first
  • Urgent warning about false teachers infiltrating the church
Key sources:
  • Jude 1 - "Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James"
  • Literary relationship with 2 Peter
​
19. I Timothy (AD 64)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Assumes Paul was released from his first Roman imprisonment and traveled again
  • "As I urged you when I was going to Macedonia, remain at Ephesus" (1 Tim 1:3)
  • This journey is not recorded in Acts - it happened after Acts ends
Key sources:
  • 1 Timothy 3:14-15 - Paul hopes to come soon but writes instructions in case of delay
  • Early church tradition of Paul's release and further travels 
​
20. II Peter (AD 64)

Author: Peter
Why this date:
  • Peter knows his death is imminent: "the putting off of my body will be soon" (2 Pet 1:14)
  • References Paul's letters as Scripture (2 Pet 3:15-16)
  • Nero's persecution began in AD 64 after the Great Fire of Rome
Key sources:
  • John 21:18-19 - Jesus predicted Peter's martyrdom
  • Tacitus, Annals 15.44 - Nero's persecution after the Great Fire
​
21. Titus (AD 65)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • "This is why I left you in Crete" (Titus 1:5) - Paul's ministry on Crete is not in Acts
  • Plans to winter at Nicopolis (Titus 3:12)
  • Between Paul's first and second Roman imprisonments
Key sources:
  • Titus 1:5 - Crete ministry
  • Early church tradition of Paul's post-release travels
​
22. John (AD 65)

Author: John, son of Zebedee, the beloved disciple
Why this date:
  • "Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate a pool" (John 5:2) - present tense
  • No mention of the temple's destruction, despite "destroy this temple" statement (2:19-21)
  • Traditional late dating (AD 90-100) assumes John outlived the other apostles
Key sources:
  • John 21:24 - "This is the disciple who is bearing witness... and who has written these things"
  • Irenaeus - "John... did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus"
​
23. I John (AD 66)

Author: John
Why this date:
  • Written after the Gospel of John (assumes readers know the Gospel)
  • Addresses a community crisis: false teachers "went out from us" (1 John 2:19)
  • Same vocabulary, style, and themes as the Gospel
Key sources:
  • 1 John 1:1-3 - The author claims to be an eyewitness of Jesus
  • Literary connection to John's Gospel
​
24. II John (AD 66)

Author: "The elder" (John)
Why this date:
  • Same themes as 1 John: truth, love, false teachers denying Christ "coming in the flesh"
  • Brief personal letter to a specific community ("the elect lady")
  • Contemporary with 1 John
Key sources:
  • 2 John 7 - Warning about deceivers who deny Jesus came in the flesh
  • Same author as 1 and 3 John
​
25. III John (AD 66)

Author: "The elder" (John)
Why this date:
  • Personal letter to Gaius about hospitality and church leadership
  • Contemporary with 1-2 John
  • Addresses practical issues in the Asian churches
Key sources:
  • 3 John 1 - "The elder to the beloved Gaius"
  • Same author and context as 1-2 John
​
26. II Timothy (AD 67)

Author: Paul
Why this date:
  • Paul's final letter, written from a Roman dungeon expecting execution
  • "I am already being poured out as a drink offering" (2 Tim 4:6)
  • "Luke alone is with me" (2 Tim 4:11) - most companions have left or been sent away
Key sources:
  • 2 Timothy 4:6-8 - Paul's farewell: "I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race"
  • Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 2.25 - Paul beheaded under Nero
​
27. Revelation (AD 68)

Author: John
Why this date:
  • "The time is near" and "I am coming soon" (Rev 1:3, 22:7, 12, 20) - urgency throughout
  • The temple is standing and will be "trampled" for 42 months (Rev 11:1-2)
  • 666 = Nero Caesar in Hebrew gematria
  • "Five kings have fallen, one is" (Rev 17:10) - if counting from Augustus, "one is" = Nero
Key sources:
  • Revelation 1:1 - "The things that must soon take place"
  • Irenaeus (late date view) vs. internal evidence (early date)
  • Josephus - The Jewish Revolt began AD 66; Nero died June AD 68; temple destroyed August AD 70
​
COMMON QUESTIONS
"Isn't this a fringe view?"

​No. It's actually the original view. The church held this dating for roughly 1,800 years. What we now call "late dating" emerged in the 1800s with German higher criticism and was reinforced by theological systems like dispensationalism that needed later dates to work. Robinson and Bernier aren't inventing something new - they're recovering what was lost.


"What about Irenaeus saying Revelation was written in AD 95?"

Irenaeus's statement (c. AD 180) is often cited as definitive proof of late dating. Here's the actual quote from Against Heresies 5.30.3:
​"We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him who beheld the apocalyptic vision. For that was seen not very long ago, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian's reign."
The problem: The Greek word translated "that was seen" (ἑωράθη) is ambiguous. It could refer to the vision being seen-or to John himself being seen alive during Domitian's reign. Many scholars argue Irenaeus is simply saying John was still alive at that time, not that he wrote Revelation then.

The bigger problem: Irenaeus is writing nearly 100 years after the fact, relying on secondhand tradition passed down through Polycarp. And this is the same Irenaeus who argued that Jesus was almost 50 years old when he died (Against Heresies 2.22.5-6)-a claim no one accepts today because it contradicts the Gospels themselves. If Irenaeus could be that wrong about something the text plainly states, his ambiguous comment about Revelation's timing is hardly the ironclad evidence late-daters treat it as.
​
More importantly, the internal evidence points to Nero's reign (AD 68):
  • The temple is still standing (Revelation 11:1-2)
  • The "seven kings" sequence points to Galba's brief reign in AD 68-69
  • 666 = "Nero Caesar" in Hebrew gematria
  • The urgent "soon" and "near" language makes sense before AD 70, not 25 years after


"This sounds like preterism. Are you denying the Second Coming?"

No. Early dating is a historical question, not a theological agenda. You can hold traditional dates and still affirm:
  • The future bodily return of Christ
  • The future resurrection of the dead
  • The future final judgment
Many conservative, orthodox scholars hold early dates without being full preterists. The question is simply: When were these books written? The evidence points to before AD 70.


"What about the rapture?"

Rapture theology - specifically the idea of a secret, pretribulation rapture - was invented by John Nelson Darby in the 1830s. It didn't exist for the first 1,800 years of church history.

Not the church fathers. Not the Reformers. Not the Puritans. Not Pilgrim's Progress (the most-read Christian book for 200 years). Not Baptist ministers in 1905.

This reading plan doesn't attack rapture theology. It simply reads the New Testament the way Christians read it for 1,800 years - before 19th-century innovations changed the framework.



"Why should I trust this over the scholarly consensus?"

The current "consensus" (late dating) isn't ancient - it dates from the mid-1800s and emerged alongside theological movements that needed later dates. Before that, the consensus was early dating.

Ask yourself:
  • Why does no NT writer mention the temple's destruction as a past event?
  • Why does Acts end abruptly in AD 62 with no mention of Paul's death, Peter's death, Nero's persecution, or the Jewish War?
  • Why does Hebrews speak of the temple system in present tense if it had been destroyed?

The evidence doesn't require a theological agenda to interpret. It just requires careful reading.


"If this is true, why haven't I heard it before?"

Because for the last 100+ years, most seminaries and Bible colleges have taught within a dispensational framework that assumes late dating. It's what pastors learned, so it's what they taught. Each generation passed it to the next without questioning the 19th-century assumptions underneath.

But the evidence has always been there. Robinson's Redating the New Testament (1976) surprised even him - he set out to validate the late-dating consensus and ended up convinced it was wrong.
​
You're not being asked to accept something new. You're being invited to examine something old that was obscured.

RECOMMENDED READING
If you want to explore the evidence yourself, here are the primary sources:

John A.T. Robinson - Redating the New Testament (1976)
The book that reopened the conversation. Robinson was a respected scholar who expected to confirm the late-dating consensus - and ended up convinced it was wrong. Accessible writing, thorough argument.
Jonathan Bernier - Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament (2022)
The most comprehensive update to Robinson's work, incorporating contemporary scholarship and Bayesian probability analysis. More technical than Robinson but worth the effort.
For historical background:
  • Josephus, The Jewish War and Antiquities of the Jews (multiple editions and translations available)
  • F.F. Bruce, New Testament History (1969)
ABOUT THIS PROJECT
This Generation is a project of the K2M Foundation, created by Tim Winders.

Tim is the host of Seek Go Create, a podcast exploring faith, leadership, and purpose. After years of studying the New Testament through a particular theological lens, he discovered that the historical evidence pointed somewhere unexpected - and that the framework he'd inherited was younger than he'd been told.

This project isn't an attack on anyone's faith. It's an invitation to read Scripture the way the first Christians did - in order, in context, with the urgency of a generation that believed they were living through the fulfillment of prophecy.
​
Questions or feedback? Reach out at seekgocreate.com.
DON'T TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT
Here's the real invitation: study it yourself.

Don't take our word for it. Don't take Robinson's word for it. Don't take Bernier's word for it. Don't take your pastor's word for it or your seminary professor's word for it.

One of the primary reasons this project exists is to get you into the text - reading the New Testament in the order it was written, immersed in the world of the first century. When you do that, you start asking questions the text itself raises. You notice things you never noticed before.

We've given you the sources. We've shown you the evidence. Now read it for yourself.

If you come to different conclusions, that's fine. At least you'll have done the work. At least you'll know why you believe what you believe - not because someone told you to, but because you examined the evidence yourself.
​
That's all we're asking. Read. Think. Pray. Study. The text and the Holy Spirit will do the rest.
WANT MORE DETAIL?
The full book version of This Generation includes extensive appendices with:
  • Detailed evidence for each book's dating
  • Extended excerpts from Josephus
  • Prophecy and fulfillment tables
  • Primary source citations
For now, start reading. The evidence will speak for itself as you experience the New Testament in order.
READY TO START?
Join thousands reading the New Testament in order-the way the first Christians experienced it.
​